A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Comparing EBITDA growth: ZTO Express vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141975400000876815000
Thursday, January 1, 201517419000001687285000
Friday, January 1, 201618102000003093956000
Sunday, January 1, 201721960000004308801000
Monday, January 1, 201817912000005185941000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919206000006727397000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020042000005197064000
Friday, January 1, 202123455000005866901000
Saturday, January 1, 202294280000011147519000
Sunday, January 1, 202380270000013853443000
Monday, January 1, 2024286300000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Tale of Two Giants: ZTO Express vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, the financial performance of companies is a testament to their strategic prowess. Over the past decade, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in EBITDA growth. From 2014 to 2023, ZTO Express has seen a staggering increase of over 1,400%, reflecting its robust expansion in the logistics sector. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker experienced a more modest growth, with a peak in 2021 before a decline in subsequent years.

Key Insights

  • ZTO Express: By 2023, ZTO's EBITDA surged to approximately 1.39 billion, marking a significant leap from its 2014 figures.
  • Stanley Black & Decker: Despite a peak in 2021, the company's EBITDA fell by over 60% by 2023, highlighting challenges in the manufacturing sector.

This analysis underscores the dynamic nature of global markets and the importance of strategic adaptability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025