Analyzing Cost of Revenue: ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Cost of Revenue: ZTO vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201472359000002770530000
Thursday, January 1, 201570998000003998737000
Friday, January 1, 201671397000006345899000
Sunday, January 1, 201779692000008714489000
Monday, January 1, 2018908050000012239568000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019963670000015488778000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020956670000019377184000
Friday, January 1, 20211042300000023816462000
Saturday, January 1, 20221266330000026337721000
Sunday, January 1, 20231168310000026756389000
Monday, January 1, 202410851300000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of global commerce, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. over the past decade.

A Decade of Growth

From 2014 to 2023, ZTO Express has seen a staggering increase in its cost of revenue, growing nearly tenfold. This reflects the company's rapid expansion in the logistics sector, driven by the e-commerce boom in China. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker's cost of revenue has grown by approximately 60%, indicating steady growth in the manufacturing and tools industry.

Key Insights

By 2023, ZTO Express's cost of revenue was more than double that of Stanley Black & Decker, highlighting the scale of operations in the logistics sector. This comparison underscores the diverse challenges and opportunities faced by companies in different industries.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025