AbbVie Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Biopharma SG&A: AbbVie vs. ADMA Spending Trends

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.AbbVie Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201448238697724000000
Thursday, January 1, 201567459686387000000
Friday, January 1, 201684947425855000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017180928356275000000
Monday, January 1, 2018225029227399000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019259107576942000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081711299000000
Friday, January 1, 20214289688912349000000
Saturday, January 1, 20225245802415260000000
Sunday, January 1, 20235902000012872000000
Monday, January 1, 202414752000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the dynamic world of biopharmaceuticals, understanding spending patterns can reveal much about a company's strategic priorities. Over the past decade, AbbVie Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, AbbVie's SG&A expenses have consistently dwarfed those of ADMA, with AbbVie spending nearly 200 times more on average. This reflects AbbVie's expansive market reach and robust operational scale. Notably, AbbVie's SG&A expenses peaked in 2022, reaching approximately 15.3 billion, a 98% increase from 2016. Meanwhile, ADMA's spending, though modest, has shown a steady upward trend, growing by over 1,100% from 2014 to 2023. This growth underscores ADMA's strategic investments in scaling operations and market presence. As these companies navigate the competitive landscape, their SG&A spending patterns offer a window into their evolving business strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025