Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AbbVie Inc. or Blueprint Medicines Corporation

SG&A Cost Optimization: AbbVie vs. Blueprint Medicines

__timestampAbbVie Inc.Blueprint Medicines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201477240000007890000
Thursday, January 1, 2015638700000014456000
Friday, January 1, 2016585500000019218000
Sunday, January 1, 2017627500000027986000
Monday, January 1, 2018739900000047928000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019694200000096388000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011299000000157743000
Friday, January 1, 202112349000000195293000
Saturday, January 1, 202215260000000237374000
Sunday, January 1, 202312872000000295141000
Monday, January 1, 20240359272000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, AbbVie Inc. and Blueprint Medicines Corporation have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

AbbVie, a giant in the industry, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 66% from 2014 to 2023. Despite this increase, the company has maintained a steady growth trajectory, reflecting its robust market position and strategic investments. In contrast, Blueprint Medicines, a smaller player, has experienced a staggering 3,640% rise in SG&A costs over the same period. This sharp increase highlights the company's aggressive expansion strategy and its commitment to innovation.

While AbbVie's expenses are significantly higher in absolute terms, Blueprint's rapid growth in SG&A costs underscores its ambitious drive to capture market share and enhance its competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025