Accenture plc and Seagate Technology Holdings plc: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Accenture vs. Seagate: Divergent SG&A Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAccenture plcSeagate Technology Holdings plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20145401969000722000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155373370000857000000
Friday, January 1, 20165466982000635000000
Sunday, January 1, 20176397883000606000000
Monday, January 1, 20186601872000562000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197009614000453000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207462514000473000000
Friday, January 1, 20218742599000502000000
Saturday, January 1, 202210334358000559000000
Sunday, January 1, 202310858572000491000000
Monday, January 1, 202411128030000460000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Spending Patterns: Accenture vs. Seagate

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Accenture plc and Seagate Technology Holdings plc have demonstrated contrasting trends in their SG&A spending.

Accenture's Strategic Growth

From 2014 to 2024, Accenture's SG&A expenses have surged by over 100%, reflecting its strategic investments in global expansion and digital transformation. By 2024, Accenture's SG&A expenses reached approximately $11.1 billion, showcasing a consistent upward trajectory.

Seagate's Cost Efficiency

Conversely, Seagate's SG&A expenses have decreased by about 36% over the same period, highlighting its focus on cost efficiency and operational optimization. By 2024, Seagate's SG&A expenses were around $460 million, indicating a leaner operational model.

These contrasting strategies underscore the diverse approaches companies take in managing their operational costs, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025