Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Alnylam vs. Catalyst: A Decade of SG&A Spending Trends

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260004473654
Thursday, January 1, 2015606100008597010
Friday, January 1, 2016893540007910260
Sunday, January 1, 20171993650007304399
Monday, January 1, 201838235900015875961
Tuesday, January 1, 201947900500036881187
Wednesday, January 1, 202058842000044233754
Friday, January 1, 202162063900049628000
Saturday, January 1, 202277065800058183000
Sunday, January 1, 2023795646000133710000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Spending Patterns: Alnylam vs. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, understanding spending patterns is crucial. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses from 2014 to 2023. Alnylam's SG&A expenses have surged by over 1,600%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and market expansion. In contrast, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals has seen a more modest increase of approximately 2,900%, indicating a steady yet cautious approach.

By 2023, Alnylam's SG&A expenses were nearly six times higher than Catalyst's, highlighting its significant investment in operational activities. This divergence in spending underscores the different strategic priorities of these companies. Alnylam's focus on rapid growth and innovation contrasts with Catalyst's emphasis on sustainable development. As the pharmaceutical industry continues to evolve, these spending patterns offer valuable insights into the strategic directions of these key players.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025