Sanofi or Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Sanofi vs. Alnylam: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Sanofi
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260008565000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015606100009496000000
Friday, January 1, 2016893540009592000000
Sunday, January 1, 201719936500010164000000
Monday, January 1, 20183823590009934000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194790050009883000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205884200009390000000
Friday, January 1, 20216206390009555000000
Saturday, January 1, 202277065800010539000000
Sunday, January 1, 202379564600010765000000
Monday, January 1, 20249755260009183000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Managing SG&A Costs: Sanofi vs. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Sanofi and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals have taken different paths in managing these costs. Sanofi, a global leader, consistently reported SG&A expenses around $9 billion annually, peaking at $10.8 billion in 2023. In contrast, Alnylam, a smaller biotech firm, saw its SG&A expenses grow from $44 million in 2014 to $796 million in 2023, reflecting its rapid expansion and investment in growth.

While Sanofi's expenses remained relatively stable, Alnylam's increased by over 1,700% during this period. This stark difference highlights the contrasting strategies of a mature pharmaceutical giant versus an emerging biotech innovator. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how companies balance growth and cost management in the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025