__timestamp | Eli Lilly and Company | HUTCHMED (China) Limited |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 4932500000 | 72049000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5037200000 | 110777000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 5654900000 | 156328000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 6070200000 | 175820000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 4681700000 | 143944000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 4721200000 | 160152000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 5483300000 | 188519000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 7312800000 | 258234000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 6629800000 | 311103000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 7082200000 | 384447000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 8418299999 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the cost dynamics is crucial. Eli Lilly and Company, a stalwart in the sector, has seen its cost of revenue fluctuate over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Eli Lilly's cost of revenue increased by approximately 44%, peaking in 2021. This growth reflects the company's strategic investments in research and development, as well as its response to market demands.
On the other hand, HUTCHMED (China) Limited, a rising star in the industry, has experienced a staggering 434% increase in its cost of revenue over the same period. This surge underscores HUTCHMED's aggressive expansion and its commitment to innovation in the Chinese market.
These trends highlight the contrasting strategies of established and emerging players in the pharmaceutical sector, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Eli Lilly and Company vs AbbVie Inc.
Eli Lilly and Company vs Incyte Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Eli Lilly and Company and BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
Eli Lilly and Company or HUTCHMED (China) Limited: Who Invests More in Innovation?
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
BeiGene, Ltd. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Insmed Incorporated vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Exelixis, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Cost of Revenue Trends: Veracyte, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Cost of Revenue Trends: Vericel Corporation vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for HUTCHMED (China) Limited and Geron Corporation
Cost of Revenue Comparison: HUTCHMED (China) Limited vs Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.