Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: Cost Dynamics of Gilead vs. Sarepta

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014378800000094103000
Thursday, January 1, 20154006000000146194000
Friday, January 1, 20164261000000130000
Sunday, January 1, 201743710000007353000
Monday, January 1, 2018485300000034193000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019467500000056586000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020457200000063382000
Friday, January 1, 2021660100000097049000
Saturday, January 1, 20225657000000139989000
Sunday, January 1, 20236498000000150343000
Monday, January 1, 202428675800000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Gilead Sciences vs. Sarepta Therapeutics

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, understanding the cost dynamics of leading companies is crucial. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. Gilead Sciences, a giant in the pharmaceutical industry, has seen its cost of revenue grow by approximately 72%, peaking in 2021. This reflects its expansive operations and robust product pipeline. In contrast, Sarepta Therapeutics, a pioneer in genetic medicine, has experienced a staggering increase of over 1,500% in its cost of revenue, highlighting its aggressive growth strategy and investment in innovative therapies. While Gilead's costs are significantly higher, the rapid rise in Sarepta's expenses underscores its commitment to advancing cutting-edge treatments. This analysis offers a glimpse into the strategic financial maneuvers of these biotech leaders over the past decade.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025