__timestamp | Ferrovial SE | ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 8802000000 | 3903572000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 9699000000 | 6086455000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 10758000000 | 9788768000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 12209000000 | 13060073000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 5737000000 | 17604451000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 6054000000 | 22109946000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 6341000000 | 25214290000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 6778000000 | 30405839000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 7551000000 | 35376996000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 8514000000 | 38418915000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of global commerce, Ferrovial SE and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. stand as titans in their respective fields. Over the past decade, these companies have showcased remarkable growth trajectories, albeit in different directions. From 2014 to 2023, ZTO Express has seen its revenue skyrocket by nearly 884%, reflecting the booming logistics sector in China. In contrast, Ferrovial SE, a stalwart in infrastructure, experienced a more modest revenue fluctuation, peaking in 2017 before stabilizing.
This comparison underscores the dynamic nature of global industries and the diverse strategies companies employ to thrive.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Ferrovial SE or IDEX Corporation?
Ferrovial SE vs China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Revenue Insights: Ferrovial SE and Avery Dennison Corporation Performance Compared
Ferrovial SE or Graco Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Ferrovial SE and Textron Inc.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis