__timestamp | China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited | Ferrovial SE |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 90185000000 | 8802000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 93969000000 | 9699000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 98904000000 | 10758000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 102475000000 | 12209000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 115210000000 | 5737000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 120796000000 | 6054000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 58470000000 | 6341000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 66887000000 | 6778000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 46111000000 | 7551000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 113741000000 | 8514000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, Ferrovial SE and China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited stand as titans in their respective industries. Over the past decade, these companies have navigated the turbulent waters of economic change, with their annual revenue growth reflecting broader market trends.
From 2014 to 2023, China Eastern Airlines experienced a rollercoaster of revenue changes, peaking in 2019 before a sharp decline in 2020, likely due to the global pandemic. However, by 2023, they rebounded impressively, achieving a revenue growth of nearly 146% from their 2020 low.
Conversely, Ferrovial SE's revenue journey was more stable, with a notable dip in 2018. Despite this, they maintained a steady recovery, showcasing resilience in the face of economic challenges. By 2023, Ferrovial SE's revenue had increased by approximately 48% from its 2018 nadir.
These trends highlight the dynamic nature of global markets and the resilience of industry leaders.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Ferrovial SE or IDEX Corporation?
Annual Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Revenue Insights: Ferrovial SE and Avery Dennison Corporation Performance Compared
Ferrovial SE or Graco Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Ferrovial SE and Textron Inc.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Ferrovial SE vs China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored