__timestamp | Apple Inc. | TE Connectivity Ltd. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11993000000 | 1882000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14329000000 | 1504000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14194000000 | 1463000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15261000000 | 1591000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 16705000000 | 1594000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18245000000 | 1490000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 19916000000 | 1392000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21973000000 | 1512000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25094000000 | 1584000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 24932000000 | 1670000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 26097000000 | 1732000000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs.
From 2014 to 2024, Apple Inc. has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 117%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy and investment in innovation. In contrast, TE Connectivity Ltd. has maintained a more stable SG&A cost structure, with only a 9% increase over the same period. This suggests a disciplined approach to cost management, focusing on efficiency and operational excellence.
While Apple's higher SG&A expenses align with its aggressive market expansion, TE Connectivity's steadier costs highlight its focus on sustainable growth. Investors and analysts can glean valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities by examining these trends.
Revenue Showdown: Apple Inc. vs TE Connectivity Ltd.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Apple Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd.
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd.
Apple Inc. and Fortinet, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Apple Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or VMware, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Apple Inc. vs Block, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.
Apple Inc. and NXP Semiconductors N.V.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Apple Inc. vs Fair Isaac Corporation
Apple Inc. and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Apple Inc. vs TE Connectivity Ltd.