Apple Inc. or TE Connectivity Ltd.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Apple vs. TE Connectivity: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampApple Inc.TE Connectivity Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014119930000001882000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015143290000001504000000
Friday, January 1, 2016141940000001463000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017152610000001591000000
Monday, January 1, 2018167050000001594000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019182450000001490000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020199160000001392000000
Friday, January 1, 2021219730000001512000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022250940000001584000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023249320000001670000000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000001732000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Managing SG&A Costs: Apple Inc. vs. TE Connectivity Ltd.

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2024, Apple Inc. has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 117%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy and investment in innovation. In contrast, TE Connectivity Ltd. has maintained a more stable SG&A cost structure, with only a 9% increase over the same period. This suggests a disciplined approach to cost management, focusing on efficiency and operational excellence.

Insights and Implications

While Apple's higher SG&A expenses align with its aggressive market expansion, TE Connectivity's steadier costs highlight its focus on sustainable growth. Investors and analysts can glean valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities by examining these trends.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025