Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.

Apple vs. The Trade Desk: SG&A Cost Efficiency Showdown

__timestampApple Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141199300000023975000
Thursday, January 1, 20151432900000040070000
Friday, January 1, 20161419400000078219000
Sunday, January 1, 201715261000000119825000
Monday, January 1, 201816705000000171981000
Tuesday, January 1, 201918245000000275930000
Wednesday, January 1, 202019916000000346359000
Friday, January 1, 202121973000000623959000
Saturday, January 1, 202225094000000863142000
Sunday, January 1, 202324932000000968248000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000001082333000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate efficiency, the battle between tech titans Apple Inc. and The Trade Desk, Inc. offers a fascinating glimpse into strategic cost management. Over the past decade, Apple has consistently maintained a robust SG&A expense, peaking at approximately $26 billion in 2024. This represents a steady increase of around 117% from 2014. Meanwhile, The Trade Desk, a rising star in digital advertising, has seen its SG&A expenses grow exponentially, from a modest $24 million in 2014 to nearly $968 million in 2023, marking an astounding 3,933% increase.

While Apple's expenses dwarf those of The Trade Desk, the latter's rapid growth trajectory highlights its aggressive expansion strategy. However, the absence of data for The Trade Desk in 2024 leaves room for speculation. As these companies continue to innovate, their ability to optimize SG&A costs will be crucial in maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025