Apple Inc. vs Applied Materials, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Apple vs. Applied Materials: Cost Efficiency Unveiled

__timestampApple Inc.Applied Materials, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141122580000005229000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151400890000005707000000
Friday, January 1, 20161313760000006314000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171410480000008005000000
Monday, January 1, 20181637560000009436000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191617820000008222000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201695590000009510000000
Friday, January 1, 202121298100000012149000000
Saturday, January 1, 202222354600000013792000000
Sunday, January 1, 202321413700000014133000000
Monday, January 1, 202421035200000014279000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Exploring Cost Efficiency: Apple Inc. vs. Applied Materials, Inc.

In the ever-evolving tech industry, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for two giants: Apple Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc., from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, Apple consistently outpaced Applied Materials in terms of revenue generation, with its cost of revenue peaking at approximately 213% higher than Applied Materials in 2022.

Apple's cost of revenue saw a steady increase, reaching its zenith in 2022, before slightly declining in 2024. In contrast, Applied Materials experienced a more gradual rise, with a notable 171% increase from 2014 to 2024. This comparison highlights Apple's robust growth and efficiency in managing costs, while Applied Materials showcases a steady, albeit slower, upward trajectory. Such insights are invaluable for investors and industry analysts seeking to understand the financial dynamics of these tech titans.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025