__timestamp | Apple Inc. | Applied Materials, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11993000000 | 890000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14329000000 | 897000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14194000000 | 819000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15261000000 | 890000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 16705000000 | 1002000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18245000000 | 982000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 19916000000 | 1093000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21973000000 | 1229000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25094000000 | 1438000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 24932000000 | 1628000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 26097000000 | 1797000000 |
Unleashing insights
In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses compared to Applied Materials, Inc., reflecting its expansive global operations and marketing strategies. However, when viewed as a percentage of revenue, Apple's SG&A costs have remained relatively stable, showcasing efficient cost management despite its scale.
From 2014 to 2024, Apple's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 117%, while Applied Materials saw a 102% increase. This indicates that both companies are expanding their operational footprints, but Apple's growth in expenses is more aligned with its revenue growth. As of 2024, Apple's SG&A expenses are nearly 15 times that of Applied Materials, highlighting the vast difference in their operational scales. This data provides a fascinating insight into how these tech titans manage their operational costs in a rapidly evolving market.
Apple Inc. vs Applied Materials, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Apple Inc. vs Applied Materials, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.
Research and Development: Comparing Key Metrics for Apple Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Apple Inc. vs Fiserv, Inc. Trends and Insights
Apple Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Apple Inc. vs Fiserv, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Lam Research Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Shopify Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Apple Inc. vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Apple Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.