Apple Inc. or Applied Materials, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Apple vs. Applied Materials: SG&A Cost Management

__timestampApple Inc.Applied Materials, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411993000000890000000
Thursday, January 1, 201514329000000897000000
Friday, January 1, 201614194000000819000000
Sunday, January 1, 201715261000000890000000
Monday, January 1, 2018167050000001002000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201918245000000982000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020199160000001093000000
Friday, January 1, 2021219730000001229000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022250940000001438000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023249320000001628000000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000001797000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Apple Inc. or Applied Materials, Inc.?

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses compared to Applied Materials, Inc., reflecting its expansive global operations and marketing strategies. However, when viewed as a percentage of revenue, Apple's SG&A costs have remained relatively stable, showcasing efficient cost management despite its scale.

From 2014 to 2024, Apple's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 117%, while Applied Materials saw a 102% increase. This indicates that both companies are expanding their operational footprints, but Apple's growth in expenses is more aligned with its revenue growth. As of 2024, Apple's SG&A expenses are nearly 15 times that of Applied Materials, highlighting the vast difference in their operational scales. This data provides a fascinating insight into how these tech titans manage their operational costs in a rapidly evolving market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025