Applied Materials, Inc. and ANSYS, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Comparing SG&A Strategies of Tech Giants

__timestampANSYS, Inc.Applied Materials, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014246376000890000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015253603000897000000
Friday, January 1, 2016269515000819000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017338640000890000000
Monday, January 1, 20184135800001002000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019521200000982000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205877070001093000000
Friday, January 1, 20217153770001229000000
Saturday, January 1, 20227728710001438000000
Sunday, January 1, 20238551350001628000000
Monday, January 1, 20249953400001797000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Innovators

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. Applied Materials, Inc. and ANSYS, Inc. have demonstrated distinct approaches to managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade.

A Decade of Growth

From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials, Inc. has consistently increased its SG&A spending, reflecting a strategic investment in growth and innovation. By 2023, their expenses surged by approximately 82% compared to 2014, reaching a peak of $1.63 billion. In contrast, ANSYS, Inc. exhibited a more conservative growth trajectory, with a 247% increase over the same period, culminating in $855 million in 2023.

Strategic Implications

These spending patterns highlight differing strategic priorities: Applied Materials focuses on aggressive expansion, while ANSYS emphasizes steady, sustainable growth. As we look to the future, these strategies will undoubtedly shape their competitive positions in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025