__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | II-VI Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1939000000 | 103218000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2074000000 | 136058000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2539000000 | 149699000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 4343000000 | 189234000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 4953000000 | 221316000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3735000000 | 243595000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 4844000000 | 246363000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 7594000000 | 682558000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 8228000000 | 689840000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 8169000000 | 613001000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 8259000000 | 682936000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of the semiconductor industry, understanding financial performance is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. has demonstrated a robust EBITDA growth, surging by over 300% from 2014 to 2024. This growth trajectory highlights its strategic prowess in capitalizing on market opportunities. In contrast, II-VI Incorporated, while showing a promising start, experienced a more modest increase, peaking in 2021 with an EBITDA that was approximately 10% of Applied Materials' peak in 2022. Notably, the data for 2024 is incomplete for II-VI, indicating potential challenges or strategic shifts. This analysis underscores the dynamic nature of the industry and the varying strategies companies employ to navigate it. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the competitive landscape and the financial health of these industry players.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs II-VI Incorporated
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and II-VI Incorporated
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Applied Materials, Inc. or II-VI Incorporated
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Applied Materials, Inc. vs II-VI Incorporated
Applied Materials, Inc. vs II-VI Incorporated: SG&A Expense Trends
EBITDA Performance Review: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Electronic Arts Inc.
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Applied Materials, Inc. vs ANSYS, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Corpay, Inc.
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Applied Materials, Inc. Against Fortive Corporation