| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1939000000 | 41003000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2074000000 | 53346000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2539000000 | 65992000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 4343000000 | 94768000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 4953000000 | 127721000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3735000000 | 119893000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 4844000000 | 185872000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 7594000000 | 291116000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 8228000000 | 563899000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 8169000000 | 521904000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 8259000000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, Applied Materials, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. have showcased remarkable growth trajectories over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials' EBITDA surged by over 320%, reflecting its robust market strategies and technological advancements. In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems experienced a staggering 1,270% increase, albeit from a smaller base, highlighting its rapid expansion and innovation-driven growth.
By 2022, Applied Materials reached an EBITDA peak, marking an impressive 8.2 billion, while Monolithic Power Systems achieved a notable 564 million. However, 2024 data for Monolithic Power Systems remains elusive, leaving room for speculation on its future performance. This comparison not only underscores the dynamic nature of the semiconductor sector but also emphasizes the strategic maneuvers of these industry giants in navigating market challenges and opportunities.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. and HP Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
EBITDA Performance Review: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Electronic Arts Inc.
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Applied Materials, Inc. vs ANSYS, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. and II-VI Incorporated: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Corpay, Inc.