__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Pure Storage, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 9072000000 | 42733000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 9659000000 | 174451000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 10825000000 | 440333000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 14537000000 | 727977000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 17253000000 | 1023019000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 14608000000 | 1359824000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 17202000000 | 1643440000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 23063000000 | 1684179000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25785000000 | 2180848000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 26517000000 | 2753434000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 27176000000 | 2830621000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, Applied Materials, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. have emerged as key players. Over the past decade, these companies have demonstrated remarkable revenue growth, reflecting their strategic prowess and market adaptability.
From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials, Inc. has seen its revenue nearly triple, showcasing a robust growth trajectory. Starting at approximately $9 billion in 2014, the company reached an impressive $27 billion by 2024. This growth underscores its leadership in the semiconductor industry, driven by innovation and expanding market demand.
Pure Storage, Inc., a relatively newer entrant, has also made significant strides. Its revenue surged from a modest $43 million in 2014 to nearly $3 billion in 2024, marking a staggering increase of over 6,500%. This growth highlights its disruptive approach in the data storage sector, capturing market share with cutting-edge solutions.
Applied Materials, Inc. or Western Digital Corporation: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Applied Materials, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Who Generates More Revenue? Applied Materials, Inc. or FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Applied Materials, Inc. and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. or VeriSign, Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Annual Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
R&D Insights: How Applied Materials, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. Allocate Funds
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.