| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Pure Storage, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1428000000 | 36081000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1451000000 | 92707000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1540000000 | 166645000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1774000000 | 245817000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2019000000 | 279196000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2054000000 | 349936000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 2234000000 | 433662000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2485000000 | 480467000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2771000000 | 581935000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3102000000 | 692528000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3233000000 | 736764000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving tech landscape, research and development (R&D) is the lifeblood of innovation. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting yet compelling R&D investment strategies. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials increased its R&D spending by approximately 126%, reflecting its commitment to maintaining a competitive edge in semiconductor technology. In contrast, Pure Storage, a leader in data storage solutions, ramped up its R&D expenses by an impressive 1,940% during the same period, underscoring its aggressive growth strategy.
While Applied Materials consistently allocated a significant portion of its budget to R&D, Pure Storage's exponential increase highlights its rapid expansion and innovation drive. By 2024, Applied Materials' R&D expenses reached over four times that of Pure Storage, yet both companies exemplify how strategic R&D investments can fuel technological advancements and market leadership.
Applied Materials, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Research and Development: Comparing Key Metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corporation
R&D Insights: How Applied Materials, Inc. and Ubiquiti Inc. Allocate Funds
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
R&D Spending Showdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
R&D Insights: How Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation Allocate Funds
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.