ASML Holding N.V. vs Fortive Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

ASML vs Fortive: A Decade of Cost Efficiency Compared

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Fortive Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201433589070003288000000
Thursday, January 1, 201533917000003183500000
Friday, January 1, 201637503000003191500000
Sunday, January 1, 201749761000003357500000
Monday, January 1, 201862257000003131400000
Tuesday, January 1, 201969199000003639700000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071813000002025900000
Friday, January 1, 202188020000002247600000
Saturday, January 1, 2022106607000002462300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023134224000002471200000
Monday, January 1, 2024137709000002500800000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Exploring Cost Efficiency: ASML Holding N.V. vs Fortive Corporation

In the ever-evolving landscape of global technology, understanding cost efficiency is paramount. ASML Holding N.V. and Fortive Corporation, two giants in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, ASML's cost of revenue surged by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation in semiconductor technology. In contrast, Fortive's cost of revenue remained relatively stable, with a slight decline of around 25% over the same period, highlighting its focus on operational efficiency.

ASML's cost of revenue peaked in 2023, reaching nearly four times its 2014 level, while Fortive's costs saw a modest reduction, underscoring its strategic cost management. This divergence offers insights into their differing business models and market strategies. As the tech industry continues to grow, these trends provide valuable lessons in balancing growth with cost efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025