ASML Holding N.V. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

ASML vs. Seagate: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201433589070009878000000
Thursday, January 1, 201533917000009930000000
Friday, January 1, 201637503000008545000000
Sunday, January 1, 201749761000007597000000
Monday, January 1, 201862257000007820000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201969199000007458000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071813000007667000000
Friday, January 1, 202188020000007764000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022106607000008192000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023134224000006033000000
Monday, January 1, 2024137709000005005000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Exploring Cost Efficiency: ASML vs. Seagate

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for ASML Holding N.V. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc from 2014 to 2023. Over this decade, ASML has demonstrated a remarkable increase in cost efficiency, with its cost of revenue growing by approximately 300%. In contrast, Seagate's cost of revenue has seen a decline of around 40%, indicating a strategic shift or operational efficiency.

A Decade of Change

ASML's cost of revenue surged from $3.4 billion in 2014 to $13.4 billion in 2023, reflecting its expanding market presence and investment in cutting-edge technology. Meanwhile, Seagate's cost of revenue decreased from $9.9 billion in 2014 to $6 billion in 2023, suggesting a focus on optimizing operations. This divergence highlights the distinct strategies of these tech giants in navigating the competitive landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025