Analyzing Cost of Revenue: ASML Holding N.V. and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.

Comparing Revenue Costs: ASML vs. ASE Technology

__timestampASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.ASML Holding N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142030510000003358907000
Thursday, January 1, 20152331530000003391700000
Friday, January 1, 20162216900000003750300000
Sunday, January 1, 20172377090000004976100000
Monday, January 1, 20183099290000006225700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193488710000006919900000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203989940000007181300000
Friday, January 1, 20214596280000008802000000
Saturday, January 1, 202253594300000010660700000
Sunday, January 1, 202349015733900013422400000
Monday, January 1, 202449972288000013770900000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's financial health. ASML Holding N.V. and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. are two titans in this field, each with distinct financial trajectories over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Insights

From 2014 to 2023, ASE Technology's cost of revenue surged by approximately 141%, peaking in 2022. This growth reflects the company's expanding operations and market demand. In contrast, ASML Holding's cost of revenue increased by about 300% during the same period, indicating a robust scaling of its production capabilities.

Strategic Implications

These trends highlight the strategic investments both companies have made to maintain their competitive edge. While ASE Technology focuses on volume, ASML's emphasis on innovation is evident in its financial growth. Investors and industry analysts should consider these dynamics when evaluating future prospects.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025