Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. or CRISPR Therapeutics AG: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Axsome vs. CRISPR: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampAxsome Therapeutics, Inc.CRISPR Therapeutics AG
Wednesday, January 1, 201413928305114000
Thursday, January 1, 2015241928913403000
Friday, January 1, 2016634364831056000
Sunday, January 1, 2017720669135845000
Monday, January 1, 2018935152248294000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191359803063488000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202889674988208000
Friday, January 1, 202166646205102802000
Saturday, January 1, 2022159253661102464000
Sunday, January 1, 202332312300076162000
Monday, January 1, 202441135900072977000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Managing SG&A Costs: Axsome vs. CRISPR

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG, two prominent players in the field, have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Axsome Therapeutics has seen a staggering increase in SG&A costs, rising from a modest $1.4 million to over $323 million. This represents a growth of over 23,000%, reflecting their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, CRISPR Therapeutics AG has maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses peaking at approximately $102 million in 2021 before declining to $76 million in 2023.

Strategic Implications

While Axsome's rapid increase in SG&A costs may indicate robust growth strategies, CRISPR's more controlled spending could suggest a focus on efficiency and cost management. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the long-term sustainability and strategic direction of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025