Comparing SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly and Company vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG Trends and Insights

Eli Lilly vs. CRISPR: A Decade of SG&A Strategies

__timestampCRISPR Therapeutics AGEli Lilly and Company
Wednesday, January 1, 201451140006620800000
Thursday, January 1, 2015134030006533000000
Friday, January 1, 2016310560006452000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017358450006588100000
Monday, January 1, 2018482940005975100000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019634880006213800000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020882080006121200000
Friday, January 1, 20211028020006431600000
Saturday, January 1, 20221024640006440400000
Sunday, January 1, 2023761620006941200000
Monday, January 1, 2024729770008593800000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Decade of SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly vs. CRISPR Therapeutics

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding the financial strategies of industry giants is crucial. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and CRISPR Therapeutics have showcased contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Eli Lilly, a stalwart in the industry, consistently allocated a significant portion of its budget to SG&A, peaking at nearly $7 billion in 2023. This reflects a steady commitment to maintaining its market presence and operational efficiency.

Conversely, CRISPR Therapeutics, a pioneer in gene-editing technology, exhibited a more dynamic trajectory. Starting with modest expenses in 2014, CRISPR's SG&A costs surged by over 1,400% by 2021, highlighting its aggressive growth strategy. However, a slight dip in 2023 suggests a strategic recalibration. This comparison underscores the diverse financial approaches within the pharmaceutical sector, driven by each company's unique market position and growth objectives.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025