Bio-Techne Corporation or Viking Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Bio-Techne vs. Viking: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampBio-Techne CorporationViking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014607160001244910
Thursday, January 1, 20151194010005029636
Friday, January 1, 20161408790004846776
Sunday, January 1, 20171992430005329003
Monday, January 1, 20182406360007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192643590009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 202026058300010731000
Friday, January 1, 202132495100010701000
Saturday, January 1, 202237276600016121000
Sunday, January 1, 202337837800037021000
Monday, January 1, 2024396826000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Cost Management: Bio-Techne vs. Viking Therapeutics

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Bio-Techne Corporation and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. offer a fascinating case study in this regard. Over the past decade, Bio-Techne has consistently managed higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $397 million in 2024. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics, with a more modest SG&A expenditure, reached its highest at around $37 million in 2023. This stark difference highlights Bio-Techne's expansive operational scale compared to Viking's more streamlined approach. Interestingly, while Bio-Techne's SG&A expenses grew by over 550% from 2014 to 2024, Viking's expenses increased by nearly 2,900% in the same period, reflecting its rapid growth phase. This data underscores the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in managing operational costs, with Bio-Techne focusing on scale and Viking on agility.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025