Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated and Viking Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Trends: Corcept vs. Viking

__timestampCorcept Therapeutics IncorporatedViking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014349160001244910
Thursday, January 1, 2015369490005029636
Friday, January 1, 2016452400004846776
Sunday, January 1, 2017624160005329003
Monday, January 1, 2018812890007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191003590009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010532600010731000
Friday, January 1, 202112235600010701000
Saturday, January 1, 202215284800016121000
Sunday, January 1, 202318425900037021000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Navigating SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, effective cost management is crucial. Over the past decade, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Corcept Therapeutics saw a staggering 428% increase in SG&A expenses, reflecting their aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Viking Therapeutics, while also experiencing growth, maintained a more conservative approach with a 287% rise over the same period. This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth and cost efficiency. As of 2023, Corcept's SG&A expenses are nearly five times that of Viking's, underscoring their differing scales and market strategies. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into the financial health and strategic priorities of these biotech firms.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025