BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

BioCryst vs. Viridian: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201474610007751000
Thursday, January 1, 20151304700010251000
Friday, January 1, 2016112530009575000
Sunday, January 1, 20171393300010912000
Monday, January 1, 20182951400011049000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193712100011646000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206792900013265000
Friday, January 1, 202111881800025805000
Saturday, January 1, 202215937100035182000
Sunday, January 1, 202321389400094999000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: BioCryst Pharmaceuticals or Viridian Therapeutics?

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability and operational efficiency. Over the past decade, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals and Viridian Therapeutics have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses. From 2014 to 2023, BioCryst's SG&A costs surged by nearly 2,800%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Viridian's expenses increased by approximately 1,200% over the same period.

BioCryst's expenses consistently outpaced Viridian's, with a notable spike in 2021, where their costs were over four times higher. This trend suggests BioCryst's aggressive investment in administrative functions, possibly reflecting strategic expansions or increased operational activities. Meanwhile, Viridian's more conservative growth in SG&A expenses might indicate a focus on cost efficiency. Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025