SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing ADMA Biologics, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Trends: ADMA vs. BioCryst Over a Decade

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201448238697461000
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596813047000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474211253000
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283513933000
Monday, January 1, 20182250292229514000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075737121000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081767929000
Friday, January 1, 202142896889118818000
Saturday, January 1, 202252458024159371000
Sunday, January 1, 202359020000213894000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotech Firms

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for success. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of ADMA Biologics, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2023.

ADMA Biologics, Inc. has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing from approximately $4.8 million in 2014 to nearly $59 million in 2023. This represents a staggering 1,125% increase, reflecting the company's expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.

On the other hand, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. started with $7.5 million in 2014 and reached over $213 million by 2023, marking a 2,755% rise. This significant growth underscores BioCryst's aggressive scaling and strategic investments in its operational infrastructure.

Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how these companies allocate resources to support their growth strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025