Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: GSK plc vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

GSK vs Neurocrine: A Decade of SG&A Strategies

__timestampGSK plcNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014824600000017986000
Thursday, January 1, 2015923200000032480000
Friday, January 1, 2016936600000068081000
Sunday, January 1, 20179672000000169906000
Monday, January 1, 20189915000000248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 201911402000000354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011456000000433300000
Friday, January 1, 202110975000000583300000
Saturday, January 1, 20228372000000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 20239385000000887600000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Decade of SG&A: GSK plc vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding the financial strategies of industry giants is crucial. Over the past decade, GSK plc and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have showcased contrasting approaches to managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. GSK, a stalwart in the industry, consistently allocated substantial resources, peaking at approximately $11.5 billion in 2020. This reflects a strategic emphasis on maintaining a robust market presence and operational efficiency. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences, a dynamic player, exhibited a remarkable growth trajectory, with SG&A expenses surging from a modest $18 million in 2014 to nearly $888 million by 2023. This 4800% increase underscores their aggressive expansion and investment in market penetration. As the pharmaceutical sector continues to innovate, these financial insights offer a window into the strategic priorities shaping the future of healthcare.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025