Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? GSK plc or Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.

GSK vs. Protagonist: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampGSK plcProtagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201482460000001860000
Thursday, January 1, 201592320000002963000
Friday, January 1, 201693660000006961000
Sunday, January 1, 2017967200000011779000
Monday, January 1, 2018991500000013697000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191140200000015749000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201145600000018638000
Friday, January 1, 20211097500000027196000
Saturday, January 1, 2022837200000031739000
Sunday, January 1, 2023938500000033491000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, GSK plc and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. GSK, a global giant, has consistently maintained SG&A expenses around $9 billion annually, peaking in 2020. In contrast, Protagonist Therapeutics, a smaller player, has seen a steady increase from $1.9 million in 2014 to $33 million in 2023, reflecting its growth trajectory.

While GSK's expenses have fluctuated, they managed a 27% reduction in 2022, showcasing their ability to adapt in challenging times. Protagonist's expenses, though smaller in scale, have grown by over 1,700% in the same period, indicating aggressive expansion. This comparison highlights the strategic differences in cost management between established and emerging pharmaceutical companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025