__timestamp | Merck & Co., Inc. | MorphoSys AG |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11606000000 | 9689000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 10313000000 | 10431000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 9762000000 | 9618000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 9830000000 | 12348000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 10102000000 | 28310241 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 10615000000 | 59336147 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 8955000000 | 159145941 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 9634000000 | 199800000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 10042000000 | 90225000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 10504000000 | 92538000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the world of pharmaceuticals, understanding the financial health of a company is crucial. This chart provides a fascinating comparison of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses between two industry players: Merck & Co., Inc. and MorphoSys AG, from 2014 to 2023.
Merck & Co., Inc., a giant in the pharmaceutical industry, consistently reported SG&A expenses averaging around $10 billion annually. Notably, 2014 marked their peak at approximately $11.6 billion, while 2020 saw a dip to $8.96 billion, reflecting a 23% decrease. This fluctuation could be attributed to strategic cost management or market conditions.
In contrast, MorphoSys AG, a smaller biotech firm, exhibited a different trend. Their SG&A expenses grew significantly, from $9.69 million in 2014 to nearly $200 million in 2021, a staggering 20-fold increase. This growth underscores their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.
This comparison highlights the diverse financial strategies and market positions of these two companies, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts.
Johnson & Johnson and Merck & Co., Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs AstraZeneca PLC Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited Trends and Insights
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Verona Pharma plc
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Merck & Co., Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Merck & Co., Inc. and Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Xencor, Inc. Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Insmed Incorporated and MorphoSys AG
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated vs MorphoSys AG Trends and Insights
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of MorphoSys AG and Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? MorphoSys AG or Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.