SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Merck & Co., Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

SG&A Trends: Merck vs. CymaBay Over a Decade

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Merck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014818500011606000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015887100010313000000
Friday, January 1, 201696450009762000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017123870009830000000
Monday, January 1, 20181438100010102000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191923800010615000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020174250008955000000
Friday, January 1, 2021230400009634000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222511600010042000000
Sunday, January 1, 20235195300010504000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures.

Merck & Co., Inc.

Merck, a global leader, has maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense, averaging around $10 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, their expenses have shown a slight downward trend, indicating improved efficiency.

CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

In contrast, CymaBay, a smaller player, has seen a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, surging by over 500% from 2014 to 2023. This rise reflects their aggressive growth strategy and market expansion efforts.

Conclusion

While Merck focuses on optimizing costs, CymaBay's rising expenses highlight their investment in growth. These insights offer a glimpse into the strategic priorities of these pharmaceutical giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025