__timestamp | CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. | Merck & Co., Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 8185000 | 11606000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 8871000 | 10313000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 9645000 | 9762000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 12387000 | 9830000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 14381000 | 10102000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 19238000 | 10615000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 17425000 | 8955000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 23040000 | 9634000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25116000 | 10042000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 51953000 | 10504000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures.
Merck, a global leader, has maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense, averaging around $10 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, their expenses have shown a slight downward trend, indicating improved efficiency.
In contrast, CymaBay, a smaller player, has seen a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, surging by over 500% from 2014 to 2023. This rise reflects their aggressive growth strategy and market expansion efforts.
While Merck focuses on optimizing costs, CymaBay's rising expenses highlight their investment in growth. These insights offer a glimpse into the strategic priorities of these pharmaceutical giants.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly and Company vs CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Amgen Inc.
Merck & Co., Inc. or argenx SE: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Merck & Co., Inc. and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Grifols, S.A.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Cytokinetics, Incorporated and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Alkermes plc or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs MiMedx Group, Inc.