__timestamp | Autodesk, Inc. | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1090900000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1281300000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1308900000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1310300000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1392500000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1524000000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1715900000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1854200000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2194800000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2277000000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2443000000 | 32065000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding the financial strategies of giants like Microsoft and Autodesk is crucial. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, both companies have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Microsoft, with its expansive global operations, has consistently outpaced Autodesk, spending nearly 10 times more annually. Notably, Microsoft's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 56% from 2014 to 2024, reflecting its aggressive market expansion and product diversification strategies. In contrast, Autodesk's expenses increased by about 124% in the same period, indicating a strategic shift towards innovation and market penetration. This financial trajectory highlights the contrasting business models: Microsoft's focus on scale and Autodesk's emphasis on niche innovation. As we move forward, these trends offer valuable insights into the strategic priorities of these tech behemoths.
Revenue Showdown: Microsoft Corporation vs Autodesk, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Microsoft Corporation and Autodesk, Inc.'s Expenses
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Intel Corporation
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Autodesk, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Synopsys, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Microsoft Corporation and Autodesk, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Atlassian Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or Workday, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Microsoft Corporation and Fortinet, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Dell Technologies Inc. Trends and Insights
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs NetEase, Inc.