Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or Workday, Inc.

Microsoft vs. Workday: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampMicrosoft CorporationWorkday, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201420488000000263294000
Thursday, January 1, 201520324000000421891000
Friday, January 1, 201619198000000582634000
Sunday, January 1, 201719942000000781996000
Monday, January 1, 201822223000000906276000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019230980000001238682000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020247090000001514272000
Friday, January 1, 2021252240000001647241000
Saturday, January 1, 2022277250000001947933000
Sunday, January 1, 2023303340000002452180000
Monday, January 1, 2024320650000002841000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Microsoft Corporation and Workday, Inc. have taken different paths in this regard over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have grown by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy. In contrast, Workday's SG&A costs have surged by over 980%, indicating its aggressive market penetration efforts.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Microsoft's steady increase in SG&A expenses, from $20 billion in 2014 to over $32 billion in 2024, showcases its focus on maintaining a robust operational framework. Meanwhile, Workday's rise from $263 million to nearly $2.8 billion in the same period highlights its rapid scaling and investment in sales and marketing. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies employed by these tech leaders to optimize their operational costs while pursuing growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025