| __timestamp | Microsoft Corporation | ON Semiconductor Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 20488000000 | 380900000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20324000000 | 386600000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19198000000 | 468300000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19942000000 | 600800000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22223000000 | 618000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 23098000000 | 585000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 24709000000 | 537400000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25224000000 | 598400000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 27725000000 | 631100000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 30334000000 | 641500000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32065000000 | 649800000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial health of industry leaders is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Microsoft Corporation and ON Semiconductor Corporation from 2014 to 2023.
Microsoft's SG&A expenses have shown a consistent upward trend, growing by approximately 56% over the decade. This increase reflects the company's strategic investments in marketing and administrative capabilities, crucial for maintaining its competitive edge in the tech industry.
In contrast, ON Semiconductor's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of around 68% from 2014 to 2023. This stability suggests a focused approach to cost management, aligning with its niche market strategy.
The data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the dynamic nature of financial forecasting in the tech sector.
Microsoft Corporation or ON Semiconductor Corporation: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Microsoft Corporation vs ON Semiconductor Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Microsoft Corporation and ON Semiconductor Corporation: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Microsoft Corporation vs ON Semiconductor Corporation
Microsoft Corporation vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Microsoft Corporation and Western Digital Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Ubiquiti Inc. Trends and Insights
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs PTC Inc.
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Microsoft Corporation and ON Semiconductor Corporation
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.