Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: BMY vs. IONS

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyIonis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014569900000020140000
Thursday, January 1, 2015500100000037173000
Friday, January 1, 2016500200000048616000
Sunday, January 1, 20174849000000108488000
Monday, January 1, 20184551000000244622000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194871000000287000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207661000000354000000
Friday, January 1, 20217690000000186000000
Saturday, January 1, 20227814000000151000000
Sunday, January 1, 20237772000000232600000
Monday, January 1, 20248414000000267474000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Cost Management: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Ionis Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (IONS) have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management.

Bristol-Myers Squibb, a global biopharmaceutical leader, consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $7.8 billion in 2022. This reflects their expansive operations and robust marketing strategies. In contrast, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, a pioneer in RNA-targeted therapeutics, maintained a leaner SG&A structure, with expenses reaching around $354 million in 2020.

Despite the disparity in absolute figures, Ionis's SG&A expenses grew by over 1,600% from 2014 to 2020, indicating a strategic investment in scaling operations. Meanwhile, Bristol-Myers Squibb's expenses increased by about 36% over the same period, showcasing their steady growth and market presence.

Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiencies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025