Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Blueprint Medicines Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Comparing SG&A Strategies: BMY vs. BPMC

__timestampBlueprint Medicines CorporationBristol-Myers Squibb Company
Wednesday, January 1, 201478900005699000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015144560005001000000
Friday, January 1, 2016192180005002000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017279860004849000000
Monday, January 1, 2018479280004551000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019963880004871000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201577430007661000000
Friday, January 1, 20211952930007690000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222373740007814000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232951410007772000000
Monday, January 1, 20243592720008414000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding the financial strategies of industry giants is crucial. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and Blueprint Medicines Corporation (BPMC) offer a fascinating study in contrasts when it comes to Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Over the past decade, BMY has consistently outspent BPMC, with SG&A expenses peaking at approximately $7.8 billion in 2022, a staggering 2,500% more than BPMC's $295 million in the same year. This disparity highlights BMY's expansive operational scale compared to BPMC's more focused approach. However, BPMC's SG&A expenses have grown nearly 3,600% since 2014, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. As the pharmaceutical industry continues to innovate, these spending patterns provide insights into how companies allocate resources to maintain competitive edges and drive future growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025