Broadcom Inc. or Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ): Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Broadcom vs. Ericsson: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampBroadcom Inc.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
Wednesday, January 1, 201440700000027100000000
Thursday, January 1, 201548600000029285000000
Friday, January 1, 201680600000028866000000
Sunday, January 1, 201779900000032676000000
Monday, January 1, 2018105600000027519000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019170900000026137000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020193500000026684000000
Friday, January 1, 2021134700000026957000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022138200000035692000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023159200000037682000000
Monday, January 1, 20244959000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Broadcom Inc. or Ericsson?

In the competitive landscape of global telecommunications, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Broadcom Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) have been at the forefront of this challenge since 2014. Over the past decade, Broadcom has demonstrated a remarkable ability to control its SG&A costs, with expenses averaging around $1.5 billion annually. In contrast, Ericsson's SG&A expenses have been significantly higher, averaging nearly $30 billion per year.

Broadcom's strategic cost management is evident in its 2023 SG&A expenses, which were approximately 5% of Ericsson's. This stark difference highlights Broadcom's efficiency in managing operational costs, a critical factor in its competitive edge. However, it's important to note that data for 2024 is incomplete, with Ericsson's figures missing, which could impact future comparisons.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025