Broadcom Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Broadcom vs. The Trade Desk: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampBroadcom Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201440700000023975000
Thursday, January 1, 201548600000040070000
Friday, January 1, 201680600000078219000
Sunday, January 1, 2017799000000119825000
Monday, January 1, 20181056000000171981000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191709000000275930000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201935000000346359000
Friday, January 1, 20211347000000623959000
Saturday, January 1, 20221382000000863142000
Sunday, January 1, 20231592000000968248000
Monday, January 1, 202449590000001082333000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Broadcom Inc. vs. The Trade Desk, Inc.: A Tale of SG&A Efficiency

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Broadcom Inc. and The Trade Desk, Inc. have shown distinct strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Broadcom's SG&A expenses surged by over 290%, peaking at nearly $5 billion in 2024. In contrast, The Trade Desk, Inc. exhibited a more controlled increase, with expenses rising by approximately 3,930% from 2014 to 2023, reaching just under $1 billion.

While Broadcom's expenses are significantly higher, The Trade Desk's rapid growth in SG&A costs reflects its aggressive expansion strategy. However, the absence of data for The Trade Desk in 2024 suggests a potential shift or anomaly in reporting. This comparison highlights the diverse approaches these companies take in managing operational costs, offering insights into their strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025