Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Broadcom Inc. or Fair Isaac Corporation

Broadcom vs. Fair Isaac: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampBroadcom Inc.Fair Isaac Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014407000000278203000
Thursday, January 1, 2015486000000300002000
Friday, January 1, 2016806000000328940000
Sunday, January 1, 2017799000000339796000
Monday, January 1, 20181056000000380362000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191709000000414086000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201935000000420930000
Friday, January 1, 20211347000000396281000
Saturday, January 1, 20221382000000383863000
Sunday, January 1, 20231592000000400565000
Monday, January 1, 20244959000000462834000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology and analytics, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Broadcom Inc. and Fair Isaac Corporation, two industry leaders, have shown distinct strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Broadcom's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,100%, peaking in 2024. This reflects their aggressive expansion and acquisition strategy. In contrast, Fair Isaac Corporation maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest 66% increase, showcasing their focus on efficiency and steady growth.

Broadcom's expenses, which were initially comparable to Fair Isaac's, have grown significantly, indicating a strategic choice to invest heavily in operational capabilities. Meanwhile, Fair Isaac's consistent expense management highlights their commitment to optimizing internal processes. As we look to the future, these trends offer insights into how each company might navigate the evolving market landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025