Catalent, Inc. or ADMA Biologics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Catalent vs. ADMA: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Catalent, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144823869334800000
Thursday, January 1, 20156745968337300000
Friday, January 1, 20168494742358100000
Sunday, January 1, 201718092835402600000
Monday, January 1, 201822502922462600000
Tuesday, January 1, 201925910757512000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202035050817577900000
Friday, January 1, 202142896889687000000
Saturday, January 1, 202252458024844000000
Sunday, January 1, 202359020000831000000
Monday, January 1, 2024935000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Catalent, Inc. vs. ADMA Biologics, Inc.: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Catalent, Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Catalent's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, peaking at approximately $935 million in 2024, reflecting its expansive operations and market reach. In contrast, ADMA Biologics, Inc. has shown a steady increase in SG&A expenses, reaching around $59 million in 2023, indicating a more conservative growth strategy.

Catalent's expenses have grown by about 180% over the decade, while ADMA's have surged by over 1,100%, albeit from a much smaller base. This data highlights the different scales and strategies of these companies, offering insights into their operational efficiencies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025