SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Pfizer Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Pfizer vs. ADMA: SG&A Expense Trends Unveiled

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Pfizer Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014482386914097000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596814809000000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474214837000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283514784000000
Monday, January 1, 20182250292214455000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075714350000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081711615000000
Friday, January 1, 20214289688912703000000
Saturday, January 1, 20225245802413677000000
Sunday, January 1, 20235902000014771000000
Monday, January 1, 202414730000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Pfizer Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A efficiency. From 2014 to 2023, Pfizer's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, averaging around $14 billion annually, with a slight dip in 2020. This stability reflects Pfizer's robust operational strategies and market dominance.

Conversely, ADMA Biologics has seen a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 1,100% from 2014 to 2023. This surge indicates ADMA's aggressive expansion and investment in market penetration. While Pfizer's expenses are nearly 500 times greater than ADMA's, the latter's rapid growth suggests a strategic push to capture market share. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into the financial strategies of pharmaceutical giants and emerging players alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025