__timestamp | ADMA Biologics, Inc. | Pfizer Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 4823869 | 14097000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 6745968 | 14809000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 8494742 | 14837000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 18092835 | 14784000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22502922 | 14455000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 25910757 | 14350000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 35050817 | 11615000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 42896889 | 12703000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 52458024 | 13677000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 59020000 | 14771000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14730000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Pfizer Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A efficiency. From 2014 to 2023, Pfizer's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, averaging around $14 billion annually, with a slight dip in 2020. This stability reflects Pfizer's robust operational strategies and market dominance.
Conversely, ADMA Biologics has seen a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 1,100% from 2014 to 2023. This surge indicates ADMA's aggressive expansion and investment in market penetration. While Pfizer's expenses are nearly 500 times greater than ADMA's, the latter's rapid growth suggests a strategic push to capture market share. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into the financial strategies of pharmaceutical giants and emerging players alike.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs GSK plc
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pfizer Inc. or Pharming Group N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Pfizer Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pfizer Inc. or Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs Mesoblast Limited
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Pfizer Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. or ADMA Biologics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.
ADMA Biologics, Inc. or ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Mesoblast Limited