Caterpillar Inc. or Comfort Systems USA, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Caterpillar vs. Comfort Systems: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampCaterpillar Inc.Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20145697000000207652000
Thursday, January 1, 20154951000000228965000
Friday, January 1, 20164686000000243201000
Sunday, January 1, 20175177000000266586000
Monday, January 1, 20185478000000296986000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195162000000340005000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204642000000357777000
Friday, January 1, 20215365000000376309000
Saturday, January 1, 20225651000000489344000
Sunday, January 1, 20236371000000536188999
Monday, January 1, 20246667000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Caterpillar Inc. or Comfort Systems USA, Inc.?

In the competitive landscape of industrial giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, Caterpillar Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. have shown distinct approaches to handling these costs. Caterpillar, a leader in construction machinery, has seen its SG&A expenses fluctuate, peaking at approximately $6.37 billion in 2023, a 12% increase from 2014. In contrast, Comfort Systems USA, Inc., a key player in mechanical systems, has managed a more consistent growth, with SG&A expenses rising from $208 million in 2014 to $536 million in 2023, marking a 158% increase. This data highlights the strategic differences in cost management between a manufacturing titan and a service-oriented company, offering insights into their operational efficiencies and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025