__timestamp | CNH Industrial N.V. | Ferrovial SE |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2591000000 | 983000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1757000000 | 1027000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1063000000 | 943000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1715000000 | 515000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2339000000 | 661000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2077000000 | 121000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 807000000 | 116000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2650000000 | 610000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3447000000 | 756000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 5549000000 | 1524000000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of global industries, understanding financial performance is crucial. This analysis delves into the EBITDA trends of two major players: Ferrovial SE and CNH Industrial N.V., from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, CNH Industrial N.V. consistently outperformed Ferrovial SE, with an average EBITDA nearly three times higher. Notably, CNH Industrial N.V. saw a remarkable surge in 2023, achieving a 60% increase from the previous year, reaching its peak. In contrast, Ferrovial SE experienced a more modest growth, with its highest EBITDA recorded in 2023, marking a 101% increase from 2022. This data highlights the resilience and strategic prowess of CNH Industrial N.V. in navigating market challenges, while Ferrovial SE shows steady, albeit slower, growth. Such insights are invaluable for investors and stakeholders aiming to make informed decisions in a competitive market.
Ferrovial SE vs CNH Industrial N.V.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Ferrovial SE Against Pentair plc
Ferrovial SE and CNH Industrial N.V.: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Ferrovial SE Against Graco Inc.
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Ferrovial SE Compared to Avery Dennison Corporation
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Ferrovial SE vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Pool Corporation