__timestamp | Ferrovial SE | Pool Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 983000000 | 204752000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1027000000 | 233610000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 943000000 | 277836000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 515000000 | 310096000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 661000000 | 341804000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 121000000 | 370520000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 116000000 | 493425000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 610000000 | 862810000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 756000000 | 1064808000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1524000000 | 786707000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, Ferrovial SE and Pool Corporation have showcased intriguing financial trajectories over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Ferrovial SE's EBITDA has seen a remarkable growth of approximately 55%, peaking in 2023 with a 1.5 billion USD equivalent. This Spanish multinational, known for its infrastructure prowess, has demonstrated resilience and strategic growth, particularly in the latter half of the decade.
Conversely, Pool Corporation, a leader in the pool supply industry, has experienced a steady climb, with its EBITDA increasing by over 400% from 2014 to 2022, before a slight dip in 2023. This growth reflects the company's robust market position and adaptability in a niche sector. The data highlights the contrasting yet successful strategies of these two giants, offering valuable insights into their financial health and market dynamics.
Who Generates More Revenue? Ferrovial SE or Pool Corporation
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Ferrovial SE and Pool Corporation
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Ferrovial SE Compared to Avery Dennison Corporation
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Ferrovial SE vs CNH Industrial N.V.
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Ferrovial SE vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.