Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Accenture plc vs Pure Storage, Inc.

Accenture vs Pure Storage: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampAccenture plcPure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142219021200024129000
Thursday, January 1, 20152310518500077552000
Friday, January 1, 201624520234000167893000
Sunday, January 1, 201725734986000252279000
Monday, January 1, 201829160515000353781000
Tuesday, January 1, 201929900325000457528000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030350881000509886000
Friday, January 1, 202134169261000535255000
Saturday, January 1, 202241892766000708329000
Sunday, January 1, 202343380138000855788000
Monday, January 1, 202443734147000809430000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and consulting, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Accenture plc, a global consulting giant, and Pure Storage, Inc., a leader in data storage solutions, present a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2024, Accenture's cost of revenue has consistently grown, peaking at approximately 44 billion in 2024, reflecting a robust 97% increase over the decade. In contrast, Pure Storage, a relatively newer player, has seen its cost of revenue rise from a modest 24 million in 2014 to around 810 million in 2024, marking an impressive 3,270% surge. This stark difference highlights the scalability challenges and growth opportunities faced by emerging tech firms compared to established industry leaders. As businesses navigate the complexities of cost management, these insights offer valuable lessons in strategic financial planning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025