Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Catalent, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited

Catalent vs. HUTCHMED: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampCatalent, Inc.HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014122910000072049000
Thursday, January 1, 20151215500000110777000
Friday, January 1, 20161260500000156328000
Sunday, January 1, 20171420800000175820000
Monday, January 1, 20181710800000143944000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191712900000160152000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202111000000188519000
Friday, January 1, 20212646000000258234000
Saturday, January 1, 20223188000000311103000
Sunday, January 1, 20233216000000384447000
Monday, January 1, 20243428000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Catalent, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited, two prominent players, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Catalent has seen its cost of revenue grow by approximately 179%, from $1.23 billion in 2014 to an impressive $3.43 billion in 2024. This growth reflects Catalent's expanding operations and market reach.

Conversely, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue increased by about 434% from $72 million in 2014 to $384 million in 2023, showcasing its rapid growth in the competitive Chinese market. However, data for 2024 is missing, leaving room for speculation about its future trajectory.

This comparison highlights the diverse strategies and market dynamics influencing these companies, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025