Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Fastenal Company vs Global Payments Inc.

Fastenal vs. Global Payments: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampFastenal CompanyGlobal Payments Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201418361050001022107000
Thursday, January 1, 201519202530001147639000
Friday, January 1, 201619972590001603532000
Sunday, January 1, 201722269000001928037000
Monday, January 1, 201825662000001095014000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928183000002073803000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030795000003650727000
Friday, January 1, 202132337000003773725000
Saturday, January 1, 202237648000003778617000
Sunday, January 1, 202339922000003727521000
Monday, January 1, 202441441000003760116000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding cost efficiency is paramount. Fastenal Company and Global Payments Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts over the past decade. Fastenal, a leader in industrial supplies, has seen its cost of revenue grow steadily, peaking at approximately $4.1 billion in 2024. This represents a robust 126% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Global Payments Inc., a titan in payment technology, experienced a more volatile trajectory, with costs peaking in 2022 at around $3.8 billion, a 270% rise from 2014.

Key Insights

  • Fastenal's Consistency: Fastenal's cost efficiency reflects a stable growth pattern, indicative of its strategic market positioning.
  • Global Payments' Volatility: The fluctuations in Global Payments' costs highlight the dynamic nature of the tech-driven payment industry.

This comparison underscores the diverse challenges and strategies in managing cost efficiency across different sectors.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025