SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Fastenal Company and Global Payments Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Fastenal vs. Global Payments

__timestampFastenal CompanyGlobal Payments Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411107760001295014000
Thursday, January 1, 201511215900001325567000
Friday, January 1, 201611694700001411096000
Sunday, January 1, 201712828000001488258000
Monday, January 1, 201814002000001534297000
Tuesday, January 1, 201914594000002046672000
Wednesday, January 1, 202014274000002878878000
Friday, January 1, 202115598000003391161000
Saturday, January 1, 202217622000003524578000
Sunday, January 1, 202318258000004073768000
Monday, January 1, 202418919000004285307000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Fastenal Company and Global Payments Inc. offer a fascinating case study in this regard. Over the past decade, Fastenal has maintained a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing approximately 70% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Global Payments Inc. has seen a more dramatic rise, with expenses surging by over 200% in the same period.

A Closer Look at Trends

Fastenal's consistent growth reflects a stable expansion strategy, while Global Payments' sharp increase suggests aggressive scaling and investment. Notably, 2023 data for Global Payments is missing, hinting at potential shifts or reporting delays. This analysis underscores the importance of SG&A efficiency in strategic planning and financial health, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025